Recently there has been changes in the simulation, where instead of "Publishing" the landing page, students are now "Optimizing" the landing page.

These changes need to be reflected in the instructions, as it is still telling students to Publish their landing pages.

Users want the ability to:
- copy campaigns, ad groups, ads and such for quicker A/B testing
- move ad groups to different campaigns
- move ads between different ad groups
- move keywords between different ads and ad groups

Users want the ability to delete different campaigns, ad groups, ads, and keywords

Add the ability to see the uploaded and cleaned data from the previous round.

Steps to replicate:
1. Allocate portion of budget that stays under the maximum.
2. Allocate over the budget limit to the other campaign.
3. Notice conflicting blue and red bars on the right hand side.
4. Change budget back on first campaign high and low. Notice the other bar changes but one stays the same.

In MA, the analytics report asks questions that sometimes require a percent answer. Despite having three acceptable answers that include a percent symbol, the text box does not allow for the percent to be entered. This does not make sense.

The graph at the beginning of R2 shows the budget allocation results. However the colors are dull and the lines are as thin as the gray measurement lines making it difficult to read at all.

The side bar that shows the decision takes up an estimated 1/4 of the screen. Since the decisions don't check off, this overview is useless to me. It would be beneficial to make a collapsable menu or at least make the decisions check off as work is completed so seeing the decisions in list form is helpful.

Change the wording for the first question on round 6. Students are confused about where the reports are from the last social media manager.

The yellow dot is still in use (rare to see pop up) and is out of place compared to the thumbs. The insight icons clash and are all hard to look at.

To discourage students from using too many keywords and slowing down the simulation, automatic zero results should be given for students who try to run the simulation using too many keywords.

There needs to be a cumulative feature on Mimic Pro to grade all the rounds, especially for instructors planning on grading the simulation at the end of the semester.
Then it would help if there was an easier way of grading teams, since the first round is the student individually and then the rest of the rounds they are in teams.

The product catalog no longer is related to the results and is not working as it should be.

Sim/courseware that helps students with selling and being a sales person in a workforce.

When students download their Mimic Social CSV spreadsheet, it is showing that their non-promotional posts are promotional (even if it does not have a cost labeled to it) and promotional posts as non-promotional.

Instructors ask for benchmarks for student results. Students are fine to be graded against each other but there's no telling if the class as a whole is doing well or poor.

At the moment, the edit audiences feature so not communicate changes correctly. For example, if you change a name on a saved audience, it will not update that change in the saved audiences drop down.

You also cannot delete a saved audience, thus causing further issue if a student accidentally creates a duplicate audience.

Simulation does not explain that users can look at each keyword for an ad in the insights tab. Instructions needed.

Professors constantly are asking to see results from specific rounds and don't want to have to dig through the CSV file and add up totals. Maybe the summary report can have a by-round total